New Amsterdam

2012 · 경제

New Amsterdam

Set in a Dutch colonial settlement on Manhattan Island, players act as wealthy patrons establishing estates and businesses to profit from the fur trade. Players bid on action lots each round to build structures, work land for food and materials, recruit indentured servants, trade with the Lenape, ship pelts to Europe, and vie for political offices. Expansion of land claims alters available actions and forces interactions with Native camps along the river, while resource management and auction placement drive strategic choices.

인원
2–5 최적 5명
플레이 시간
90분
연령
12+
복잡성
3.2 / 5
5 Ludoya 기준르네상스경매: 한 바퀴영역 과반/영향력경매 / 입찰

게임 소개

구매처

매장 가격과 중고 매물을 매일 확인합니다.

Ludoya에서 모든 가격 비교

Ludoya 테이블에서는

Ludoya에서 전체 통계 보기
15
기록된 플레이
26
플레이어
1h 6m
평균 플레이 시간
4
컬렉션 보유

5.0/10

Ludoya 리뷰 7개 기준

  • Evan4.6

    This is a very tough game. Players bid at the start of each round for not only turn order, but the actions they are allowed to resolve. The bid is really interesting in that you can spend even resources on the bid, which means you could easily get the actions you need but find you've overspent and then you might not be able to resolve those actions properly. I'm not sure how getting a big early corn production isn't the best move all the time, as it not only fuels your other goals, but since you can bid with it, you can win whichever auctions you want. Of course if several players realize that, then they'll bid more aggressively for it and turn order so maybe that self balances? The game is unique in that I can't easily describe it to someone using the generic terms we have for mechanisms. This to me is a really good thing. The problem with the game is that it feels very feast or famine. Either you have more than you can use of something, or you don't have any. It's extremely punishing for players who make mistakes, and at the end, win or lose, you don't really get the satisfying feeling of having built or accomplished something. It feels close to greatness, but it's just lacking some crucial magic. ★ Art, Iconography and components functional ★ Clever or interesting mechanisms ★ Reasonably low downtime between turns with mildly AP players ★ Multiple plays stay interesting ★ Low or mitigatable luck elements ★★☆☆☆ Raw enjoyment

  • Sup8.3

    Sleeved

리뷰 읽고 평가하기

게임 정보(인원, 플레이 시간, 연령, 제작진) 출처: BoardGameGeek.