Churchill

Three players portray the wartime leaders of the Allied powers and maneuver through a series of ten conferences that shape military direction, production priorities, clandestine operations, and postwar influence. Each conference plays as a card-driven debate around a circular table: players play staff-person cards to move named issues toward their side, contest ownership, and occasionally expend their Head of State with powerful but risky effects. Winning issues grants leverage in bilateral global questions and determines which actions each side can implement in the ensuing phase. Post-conference play resolves clandestine networks, political actions, and abstractized military offensives across multiple theaters; fronts advance against Axis reserves and surrender when pushed into the enemy homeland. Scenarios cover the full war or shorter segments, with two- and three-player and solitaire options.

Giocatori: 1–3 ideale in 3
Tempo di gioco: 60–300 min
Età: 14+
Complessità: 3,4 / 5

7,7 su Ludoya da 63,69 €PoliticoSeconda guerra mondialeLancio di dadiCampagna / Basato su Carte di BattagliaAsta / Offerte

Giocalo con Ludoya Dove comprarlo

Il gioco

Autori: Mark Herman
Illustrazioni: Mark Simonitch
Rodger B. MacGowan
Charles Kibler
Publisher: GMT Games

Foto dai tavoli di Ludoya

Tutte le foto in Ludoya

Dove comprarlo

Prezzi dei negozi e copie usate, controllati ogni giorno.

Confronta tutti i prezzi in Ludoya

Prezzo più basso, ultimi 12 mesi63,39 € – 70,73 €

Sui tavoli di Ludoya

Tutte le statistiche in Ludoya

101
Partite registrate: 119
Giocatori: 3h 14m
Partita media: 44
Nelle ludoteche: 11
Nelle liste dei desideri

7,7/10

da 23 recensioni Ludoya

Mario López Menés7,2
A fantastic political simulator! PROS - The game generates dynamics I've never seen in any other design. It embraces kingmaking through its 3-player nature, constant alliances / mutual interests / clashing strategies and final scoring scenarios. - Each different faction has strengths and weaknesses, but their implementation is subtle and historically accurate (broadly speaking). CONS - In order to remain historically accurate, some rules are fiddly and the design is more complex than needed. - The subtle asymmetry means that players will not grasp the differences and strategies in their first games. It is definitely not a game for casual players or to play once expecting to do a good performance.