詭鎮懸案:洛夫克拉夫特式恐怖推理遊戲

2016 · 基于小说

詭鎮懸案:洛夫克拉夫特式恐怖推理遊戲

Players take on the role of investigators in 1920s Arkham, piecing together Lovecraftian mysteries through narrative clues and documents. The game provides a newspaper, an ally roster, a resident directory, and a map to follow leads from locations to suspects and gather evidence. Play focuses on cooperative deduction and information management: visit sites, consult sources, and decide how many clue points to expend while balancing sanity risks. Each scenario ends with a set of questions; final scoring weighs clues used, sanity lost, and the accuracy of the answers compared to a benchmark investigator.

人数
1–10 最佳 3 人
游戏时长
60–120 分钟
年龄
13+
复杂性
2.1 / 5
4.1 来自 Ludoya恐怖推理合作游戏叙事单人 / 接龙游戏

在哪里买

商店价格和二手货源,每天检查。

在 Ludoya 中比较所有价格

在 Ludoya 的牌桌上

在 Ludoya 中查看完整统计
71
已记录对局
30
玩家
1h 42m
平均时长
19
收藏数
4
愿望清单数

4.1/10

基于 9 条 Ludoya 评测

  • Evan2.5

    This is a mystery solving game in the same style as Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective. The general idea is there's a choose your own adventure book, and players take turns deciding who to talk to and where to go. When you think you've solved the mystery, the book asks you questions about the case, and you score based on how well you can answer the questions minus points for wrong turns you made. The game was fun, and introduced some nice mechanisms beyond that you find in Sherlock, for example, this game might give you a different encounter text based on if you have an item or not, or even what time of day it is. On the other hand, the text passages aren't quite as well written in Sherlock. In Sherlock, the person you meet will give you some piece of information, and then you need to figure out what to do with it, without much guidance. In Mythos, so far anyway, guy A tells you to go see guy B, who tells you that you really should talk to guy C. Another difference is that Sherlock lets you walk around talking to people, accumulating negative points as you go, as long as you want to. Mythos has a fixed timer. This is an interesting element, but it does make me feel like I'm missing out on plot, and it sort of seems like a crutch to compensate for the different investigation paths being too straightforward. I'm tempted to say, we should just ignore the timer in future plays and just take negative points beyond a certain point? ★ Art, Iconography and components functional ☆ Clever or interesting mechanisms ★ Reasonably low downtime between turns with mildly AP players ★ Multiple plays stay interesting ★ Low or mitigatable luck elements ☆☆☆☆☆ Raw enjoyment

  • Taha Afyouni5.9

    The Sherlock Holmes Consulting Detective games are my favorite board games, so I was really interested in this even though I'm not generally a Cthulhu fan. My group had fun with this one. While there was quite a bit of errata, we still enjoyed our time with it.

阅读评测并打分

游戏信息(人数、游戏时长、年龄、制作人员)来自 BoardGameGeek