流画溢彩

MoMohaszstar8.1

This is an odd one. It's obviously beautiful, fun and innovative, but not without hiccups. Firstly, if you try to maximize your score (which you should usually do), it's rather arbitrary whether your painting will make any sense or look any good. That said, it's very rewarding when it does look good and also scores high. Secondly, this game has a bit of a "That's it?" effect. It's really short and simple, all you do is puzzle 3 paintings together, so in a way it can be a little anticlimactic sometimes. Thirdly, there's a quite a lot of luck. You're screwed and forced to create a bad painting if the correct cards are not coming up. Finally, the continuous thinking on the maximization of the scores (depending on the players obv.) can cause some AP issues which can be concerning with such a short game. I like this better now, it’s a really satisfying filler. + Mirrors

玩过 3 次

Thijs van den Hovenstar7.5

actually own the deluxe edition (bad BGG for splitting)

玩过 7 次

GaGarfieldstar7.0

#48 A very nice looking game.It's a very nice idea. [c] Theme: ★★★★☆ <!-- size 7]Painting --> Gameplay: ★★☆☆☆ <!-- size 7]Not much you can do --> Interaction: ★☆☆☆☆ <!-- size 7]No --> Artwork: ★★★★★ <!-- size 7]Beautiful --> Luck: ★★★☆☆ <!-- size 7]Random card revealing --> Strategy: ★★★☆☆ <!-- size 7]Try to score in multiple categories --> Components: ★★★★☆ <!-- size 7]Very nice --> Play duration: ★★★★★ <!-- size 7]Perfect --> Easy to teach: ★★★★☆ <!-- size 7]Quite easy --> Rules quality: ★★★★★ <!-- size 7]Perfect --> Setup time: ★★★★☆ <!-- size 7]Very fast --> No downtime: ★★★★★ <!-- size 7]Almost no downtime --> Replay value: ★★★☆☆ <!-- size 7]Different categories, different cards --> [/c]

无记录对局