Pax Pamir

2015 · 间谍/秘密特工

Pax Pamir

Players take the roles of Afghan leaders maneuvering between competing imperial powers in 19th‑century Central Asia. Through card play and area influence, players recruit agents, build alliances, and shift the balance toward British, Russian, or Afghan supremacy. Event cards and market actions change available options each turn, requiring adaptation as control of provinces and key figures swings. Victory is determined by which empire achieves dominance and which player holds the most influence within that outcome, making political positioning and timing the central challenges.

人数
2–5 最佳 4 人
游戏时长
60–120 分钟
年龄
12+
复杂性
3.7 / 5
5 来自 Ludoya¥608.28 起谈判政治模拟区域移动区域多数 / 影响力

在 Ludoya 的牌桌上

在 Ludoya 中查看完整统计
12
已记录对局
21
玩家
2h 1m
平均时长
4
收藏数
3
愿望清单数

5.0/10

基于 4 条 Ludoya 评测

  • Evan4.6

    This is a very solid game that comes in a very small box. The general idea is that it takes place during a time that England and Russia were beefing over Afghanistan. You play an Afghani who's goal is to have the most influence with the winning side when the government collapses. Through which cards people buy, you can shift your allegiance, you can shift what the winning conditions are, and you can take actions on your cards, some of which will not count against your action limits for that turn depending on what the current victory conditions are. This is absolutely a complicated game where there are wheels within wheels, and on your first play you are not going to have a clear idea of what looks like a good action, let alone how to keep your opponents in check. By the end of the first game I felt like I was starting to get a sense of things, and I could see how this is a deep, well designed and rewarding game. That being said, this game just isn't for me at all. Maybe it's just too wild, but I didn't find the experience of play enjoyable in any way. I'm still working out why that is. ★ Art, Iconography and components functional ★ Clever or interesting mechanisms ★ Reasonably low downtime between turns with mildly AP players ★ Multiple plays stay interesting ★ Low or mitigatable luck elements ★☆☆☆☆ Raw enjoyment

阅读评测并打分

游戏信息(人数、游戏时长、年龄、制作人员)来自 BoardGameGeek